References

[1] Barone, G., & Frangopol, D. M. (2014). Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost. Structural Safety, 48, 40–50. 
[2] Klöpffer, W., & Grahl, B. (2014). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice – Goal and Scope Definition. Wiley-VCH. 
[3] Sánchez-Silva, M., & Riascos-Ochoa, J. (2013). Seismic risk models for aging and deteriorating buildings and civil infrastructure. Woodhead Publishing. 
[4] Straub, D. (2014). Value of information analysis with structural reliability methods. Structural Safety, 49, 75–85. 
[5] Dekker, R. (1996). Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliability engineering & system safety, 51(3), 229-240. 
[6] Van Horenbeek, A., Pintelon, L., & Muchiri, P. (2010). Maintenance optimization models and criteria. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1(3), 189-200. 
[7] Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., & Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 15(1), 27-34. 
[8] Frangopol, D. M., Dong, Y., & Sabatino, S. (2019). Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making. In Structures and infrastructure systems (pp. 66-84). Routledge. 
[9] Zitzler, E., Deb, K., & Thiele, L. (2000). Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary computation, 8(2), 173-195. 
[10] Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R., Christiansen, K., & Klüppel, H. J. (2006). The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 11(2), 80-85. 

Home | introdaction | Integration Context | Maintenance Strategies | Life-cycle Analysis | Multi-Objective Optimizatin