{"id":24704,"date":"2026-02-01T21:46:31","date_gmt":"2026-02-01T21:46:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/?page_id=24704"},"modified":"2026-02-09T19:23:00","modified_gmt":"2026-02-09T19:23:00","slug":"ontology","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/?page_id=24704","title":{"rendered":"Ontology"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:30px\">Introduction &amp; Purpose:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">The ontology is designed to represent core concepts for the conceptual design and comparison of truss systems, specifically focusing on timber and steel-timber hybrid structures in structural engineering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\"><strong>Scope:<\/strong><br>The scope includes physical truss components (chords, diagonals, verticals), geometric arrangements (web patterns), and analytical entities (materials, profiles, performance data). It focuses strictly on the truss as a load-bearing subsystem, excluding the broader global building context like roof layouts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\"><strong>Intended Users &amp; Use:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">Users:&nbsp;Designers, structural engineers, and researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">Use:&nbsp;Decoupling topology, geometry, and material definitions to allow for automated reasoning across different configurations, facilitating CAD\/FEM workflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:30px\">Class Hierarchy:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">The ontology follows a structured taxonomy:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"778\" height=\"258\" src=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24705\" style=\"width:528px;height:auto\" srcset=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59.png 778w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59-300x99.png 300w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59-768x255.png 768w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59-520x172.png 520w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-59-740x245.png 740w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 778px) 100vw, 778px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">1.Trusses:&nbsp;Subclassed by geometry (Parallel, Tied Arch, Trapezoidal)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">2.Physical Components:&nbsp;Chords (Upper\/Lower), Diagonals, and Verticals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">The truss is modeled via its physical members: chords, verticals, diagonals, where Chord splits into disjoint Upper\/LowerChord.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-60.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"691\" height=\"285\" src=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-60.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24706\" style=\"width:587px;height:auto\" srcset=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-60.png 691w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-60-300x124.png 300w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-60-520x214.png 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 691px) 100vw, 691px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">3.WebPattern:&nbsp;Abstract topology<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">A. Arrangement \u2013 Outer\/Chord-Geometry:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol style=\"list-style-type:upper-alpha\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">After surveying common truss families, the outer shape is governed by the geometry of the chords and can be categorized into: straight, curved and pitched: Following Noy &amp; McGuinness\u2019s guidance to avoid redundancy, this is modeled locally on the chords via the data property hasChordShape \u2208 {straight, pitched, curved}, rather than as a global truss attribute (e.g., a hasOverallShape data property).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-61.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"757\" height=\"304\" src=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-61.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24707\" style=\"width:510px;height:auto\" srcset=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-61.png 757w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-61-300x120.png 300w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-61-520x209.png 520w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-61-740x297.png 740w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 757px) 100vw, 757px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">B. Arrangement \u2013 Inner\/Web-Geometry:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol style=\"list-style-type:upper-alpha\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">The WebPattern class represents abstract topology (not physical members), separating conceptual layout from domain objects (Noy &amp; McGuinness). Each pattern defines symmetry and diagonal orientation via <em>hasVerticals<\/em>, <em>hasDiagonalDirection<\/em>, and <em>panelCount<\/em>. This allows patterns like Warren, Pratt\/Howe, or Vertical-Only to be formally described without having to instantiate individual bars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"497\" src=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62-1024x497.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24708\" style=\"width:674px;height:auto\" srcset=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62-1024x497.png 1024w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62-300x146.png 300w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62-768x373.png 768w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62-520x252.png 520w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62-740x359.png 740w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-62.png 1030w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">4.Material (Wood, Steel), Profile (Dimensions), LoadEntity (System\/Local loads), and StructuralPerformance (Capacity\/Utilization).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hierarchy-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"261\" height=\"504\" src=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hierarchy-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24709\" style=\"width:188px;height:auto\" srcset=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hierarchy-1.png 261w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hierarchy-1-155x300.png 155w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 261px) 100vw, 261px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:30px\">Ontograf:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"793\" height=\"577\" src=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24710\" style=\"width:543px;height:auto\" srcset=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1.png 793w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1-300x218.png 300w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1-768x559.png 768w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1-520x378.png 520w, http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Ontograf-1-740x538.png 740w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 793px) 100vw, 793px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:30px\">Engineering Examples:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol style=\"list-style-type:upper-alpha\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"font-size:15px\">Concept Selection:&nbsp;Filtering truss types and patterns for a 32m long-span hall.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li style=\"font-size:15px\">Material Substitution<strong>:<\/strong>&nbsp;Swapping timber lower chords for steel to address fatigue while keeping the web pattern fixed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li style=\"font-size:15px\">Logistics Check:&nbsp;Prefiltering designs based on a 12m maximum element length for transport and fabrication.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:30px\">Conclusion &amp; Limitations:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">The ontology successfully enables automated design comparison and &#8220;what-if&#8221; scenarios. However, it currently lacks explicit node\/joint localization, meaning it cannot yet support full structural analysis (boundary conditions and load paths) without further development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"font-size:30px\">References:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">1.N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford KSL Tech. Rep. KSL-01-05, 2001. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/protege.stanford.edu\/publications\/ontology_development\/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">2.AASHTO\/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration, G13.2\u20132024: Guidelines for Steel Truss Bridge Analysis. Washington, DC, 2024. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.aisc.org\/globalassets\/nsba\/aashto-nsba-collab-docs\/g13.2-2024-guidelines-for-steel-truss-bridge-analysis.pdf. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">3.Timber Frame Engineering Council (TFEC), TFEC 4-2020: Design Guide for Timber Roof Trusses. 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/dcstructural.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">4.Theoretical Analysis of Truss Height-to-Span Ratio Selection. In: TETR (Trends in Environmental Technology Research) Proceedings, 2024. [Online] (preprint). Available: https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/391610677_Theoretical_Analysis_of_Truss_Height-to-span_Ratio_Selection. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">5.D. Johnstone, R. Hairstans, and A. Livingstone, \u201cDesign of a long span Belfast truss using UK home-grown timber,\u201d in ECCM-ECFD 2018 Conference Proceedings, 2018. [Online] (preprint). Available: https:\/\/westernwoodstructures.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/An-Update-on-Bowstring-Truss-Issues-.pdf<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">6.A. S\u00e1nchez-Rodr\u00edguez, \u201cPreventing failure propagation in steel truss bridges,\u201d ce\/papers, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1018\u20131025, 2023. doi: 10.1002\/cepa.2377. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/cepa.2377. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">7.A. Patnaik, \u201cEffective Lengths of Members in Parallel Chord Trusses Made from Hollow Structural Sections,\u201d Current Trends in Civil &amp; Structural Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, 2023. doi: 10.33552\/CTCSE.2023.09.000722. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/irispublishers.com\/ctcse\/pdf\/CTCSE.MS.ID.000722.pdf. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">8.CEN, EN 1993-1-1: Eurocode 3 \u2014 Design of steel structures \u2014 Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2005; A1:2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:15px\">9.P. Hitzler, M. Kr\u00f6tzsch, and S. Rudolph, Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman &amp; Hall\/CRC, 2009.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/?page_id=24712\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"24712\">Parametric Model<\/a> ><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction &amp; Purpose: The ontology is designed to represent core concepts for the conceptual design and comparison of truss systems, specifically focusing on timber and steel-timber hybrid structures in structural engineering. Scope:The scope includes physical<a class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/?page_id=24704\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":300,"featured_media":0,"parent":24626,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-24704","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/300"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=24704"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24704\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28802,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24704\/revisions\/28802"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=24704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}