![\"fig-1\"](\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Fig.19.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nLIFE-CYCLE TIMELINE:<\/h3>\n
The following Maintenance Plan was put in place for each design Option according to the needs of its Components:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Regarding the Emissions we find that the R analysis provides us with the following Radar Plot which shows the amount of Emissions resulting from each Design Option, we notice clearly that Design Option 1 by and far is considered the least polluting and Energy consuming of all three.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a mathematical method that assigns a score to each Design Option based on the Weights assigned to certain built-in Criteria by the Expert, The results here show that Option 1 has the highest score.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is another Method that works by determining the Distance between each Alternative and the Ideal Options as well as allowing tradeoffs between Multiple Criteria within the same Option, as the results show that Option 1 has a clear advantage.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Carbon Footprint of Bridges, David Collings. Introduction: Bridges represent a critical Part of the Infrastructure Network in any Country as it plays a vital Role in the Movement of Goods as well as the Transit and Transportation of Passengers. ThereforeContinue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":182,"featured_media":0,"parent":13468,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13661","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/182"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13661"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13661\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13698,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13661\/revisions\/13698"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nLife Cycle Inventory and Analysis:<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nAHP and TOPSIS:<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/h3>\n
References used:<\/h3>\n
\nBridge Carbon Emissions and Driving Factors Based on a Life-Cycle Assessment Case Study: Cable-Stayed Bridge over Hun He River in Liaoning, China, ZhiWu Zhou, Juli\u00e1n Alcal\u00e1, and V\u00edctor Yepes.
\n(Ellobody Ehab ,Finite element analysis and design of steel and steel-concrete composite bridges).
\nMarceau, M., Nisbet, M.A. and Van Geem, M.G., 2007.Life cycle inventory of portland cement concrete.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"