Table\u00a01 – Section of the Life Cycle Inventory table<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Furthermore, we are going to assign a certain cost to each indicator (Table 2).<\/p>\n Table 2 – Environmental costs for each indicator<\/p>\n Now, the LCA can be conducted by taking into account the values of the LCI and environmental costs. First, it is interesting to see the environmental impact of each subsystem. As it can be seen in Figure 1, the Sump pits has a great environmental impact whereas the other subsystems has a\u00a0significantly low impact. The reason for that is that the Sump pit\u00a0 have high quality and reinforcement in the structure. As in Table 1 shown, steel has higher values for each indicator compared to the other materials.<\/p>\n Figure 1 – LCA of each subsystem<\/p>\n The distribution of each indicator for the\u00a0best\u00a0five\u00a0strategy options<\/strong>\u00a0are shown in Figure 2 below. There is no strategy option that is\u00a0significantly\u00a0showing the best impact on the environment but it can be identified that strategy option 4 has for all four indicators the\u00a0lowest values.<\/p>\n Figure 2 – LCA results for five strategy options<\/p>\n Another way of showing the results of the LCA is done with a radar plot (Figure 3). The comparison can be better conducted since it is more visible which strategy options have more or less impact on the environment.<\/p>\n Until now, we only discussed the performance data of the integrated system and its subsystems after conducting the LCA. However, having multiple performance criteria on hand, we improve our model by using the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method which is one of the multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods.<\/p>\n First, a score matrix for each performance criteria is developed based on the LCA results.<\/p>\n \u00a0 Table 3 –\u00a0AHP – Pairwise comparison of the criteria<\/p>\n After performing AHP in R we\u00a0pie chart plot of the AHP results, which is shown in Figure 4. The conclusion of our MCDM based AHP model clearly indicates that strategy option 4 is the most suitable and high multi performing design option with 33,5 %.<\/p>\n Figure 4 – AHP results<\/p>\n As the last part in the LCA, we take a look on the environmental cost.\u00a0The costs for the five\u00a0strategy options are visible in Figure 4. Here,\u00a0the cost for each indicator has been summed up, thus these results show the total environmental impact of the strategy options. Strategy option 3 and 5 show the lowest cost followed by strategy option 4. By taking into account the above-conducted AHP results, strategy option 4 would be the best choice for the stakeholder since it would lead to the lowest\u00a0environmental impacts and environmental costs.<\/p>\n Figure 5 –\u00a0Environmental cost of each strategy option<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Life Cycle Assessment provides a factual analysis and a good forecast of the environmental impact of a system over its entire lifetime. This makes it possible to identify and quantify the flow of energy andContinue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":119,"featured_media":0,"parent":8853,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-10145","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/119"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10145"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10856,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10145\/revisions\/10856"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"new\"](\"http:\/\/141.23.68.248\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/new.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a>Figure 3 – Radar plot of LCA results<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n